Home › Categories › Business & Finance› 'Why Do I Have To Give My Review A Title? - A Curmudgeon'

'Why Do I Have To Give My Review A Title? - A Curmudgeon'.pdf

acp-2016-1173-RC1.pdf

Preview of 'Why do I have to give my review a title? - A curmudgeon'

🔗 Source: acp.copernicus.org

📊 Size: 57 KB

📄 Pages: 3 pages

⬇️ Downloads: 193

Summary

Anonymous Referee #3 finds the paper an interesting contribution but raises several concerns, including the need for more care in inferring results from data, particularly in section 6.2. The referee suggests redefining layers as 'optically dominated by ash or sulfate aerosol' and questions the large variations in the backscatter to extinction ratio. They also criticize the use of the Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) and suggest avoiding it. Additionally, the referee finds some figures too small and suggests that the authors are over-analyzing their results, forgetting that they never measure the same aerosol and that changes may be due to variability in the cloud or mixing with ambient aerosol.

Download File

Description

Anonymous Referee #3 finds the paper an interesting contribution but raises several concerns, including the need for more care in inferring results from data,...

Technical Information

File Format: PDF
File Size: 57 KB
Pages: 3
Language: EN
Total Downloads: 193
Last Updated: 2 months ago

Document Overview

This PDF document about 'Why do I have to give my review a title? - A curmudgeon' provides comprehensive information and guidance. Whether you're a beginner or advanced user, this resource offers valuable insights into 'Why do I have to give my review a title? - A curmudgeon'.