<think>.pdf

Final judgment of the Hearing Panel in the disciplinary matter involving Christopher Wayne Barber, BPR #020607. The panel found Barber admitted allegations after default due to failure to respond to the petition filed January 4, 2013. Key violations include: Barber delayed filing a critical court order for five months (November 2010 to April 2011); failed to notify client Kim Johnson of his December 3, 2010 suspension from practice of law (required by Rule 9, §§ 18 and 32.5) and withdrew as her attorney; continued practicing law while suspended, representing Johnson for four months after suspension; filed an Order to Show Cause without disclosing his suspension to the court; and failed to respond to disciplinary inquiries. These actions violated Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3 (diligence), 1.4 (communication), 1.16 (termination), 5.5 (unauthorized practice), 3.3(h) (candor), and 8.4 (misconduct). The panel identified aggravating factors: prior public censure for practicing while suspended (March 19, 2012), a pattern of misconduct involving willful neglect, misrepresentation of license status, and failure to comply with court and disciplinary orders. Barber's conduct constituted a pattern of professional misconduct warranting discipline under ABA Standards 4.42 and 7.2.