Home › Categories › Education & Learning› Mentorship Survey Review

Mentorship Survey Review.pdf

12909_2018_1191_ReviewerReport_V0_R2.pdf

🔗 Source: static-content.springer.com

📊 Size: 69 KB

👤 Author: MBALIVA

⬇️ Downloads: 89

Summary

The reviewer's report critiques the survey on active mentorship among faculty in the Department of Medicine and Massachusetts General Hospital. Key concerns include:

The survey only considers mentors within MGH, potentially masking benefits of external mentorship.
Confusing questions about primary mentors and the lack of inquiry into never having a mentor.
Insufficient data analysis on the impact of discrimination on mentorship and career advancement.
The need for additional statistical review is not recommended, but the conclusions drawn are not adequately supported by the data.

The reviewer finds the methods and controls to be appropriate, the written English to be acceptable, and declares no competing interests. The report agrees to the open peer review policy, allowing the named report to be posted on the website under an Open Access Creative Commons CC-BY license.

Download File

Description

The reviewer questions the survey's focus on mentors within MGH, noting that mentors outside the institution can also provide benefits. This narrow focus may mask the true extent of mentorship and its impact on career advancement and job satisfaction. The survey's results may be confounded by excluding external mentors.

Technical Information

File Format: PDF
File Size: 69 KB
Pages: 3
Language: EN
Author: MBALIVA
Total Downloads: 89
Last Updated: 3 hours ago

Document Overview

This PDF document about Mentorship Survey Review provides comprehensive information and guidance. Whether you're a beginner or advanced user, this resource offers valuable insights into Mentorship Survey Review.