Møte 16. Mars 2011: Muntlig Spørretid Og Representantforslag.pdf

Okay, I need to create a concise and detailed summary of this Norwegian parliamentary meeting in Norwegian. Let me start by reading through the provided text carefully.

The meeting is on March 16, 2011, at 10:00. The president is Dag Terje Andersen. The agenda item number 63 includes a verbal question session. The first point is about the limits of dialogue with certain organizations, specifically mentioning Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. The representative Peter N. Myhre from FrP questions the Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre about whether organizations like the Farc in Colombia or ETA in Spain should be engaged in dialogue. The Foreign Minister responds by explaining that the Muslim Brotherhood is part of the groups that have been suppressed in Egypt and that dialogue is important to understand their internal dynamics and positions on human rights, democracy, and coexistence. He also mentions that the Muslim Brotherhood is not necessarily an extreme Islamic organization but has internal tensions. The representative then points out that the Foreign Minister's actions might be seen as legitimizing these groups, to which the Foreign Minister clarifies that dialogue is a tool to express opposition and hold them accountable, not endorsement.

Next, the president moves to the next follow-up question from Tone Liljeroth of FrP. She asks if the Foreign Minister's dialogue with the Muslim Brotherhood is seen as legitimizing an extreme Islamic organization and their lack of understanding of human rights. The Foreign Minister reiterates that he doesn't automatically consider them as extreme, but the dialogue is critical and aims to foster understanding of human rights and democratic institutions.

I need to make sure the summary captures the key points: the debate on dialogue with groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, the Foreign Minister's stance on understanding their internal issues, the representative's concern about legitimization, and the Foreign Minister's clarification that dialogue is a means to hold them accountable, not to endorse their views. Also, mention the follow-up question and the minister's response to that.

Check for any specific terms or names that need to be included. The organizations mentioned are Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, Farc, ETA. The key is to note the context of Egypt's political changes and the Foreign Minister's position on engaging with such groups despite their controversial nature.

Avoid adding any extra information not in the text. Keep it factual and in Norwegian. Make sure the summary is structured clearly, starting with the meeting details, then the main discussion points, and the responses from the Foreign Minister. Also, include the follow-up question and answer. Ensure it's concise but covers all the main arguments and the minister's position.

Møtet var på torsdag den 16. mars 2011 kl. 10, med president Dag Terje Andersen. Dagsorden nr. 63 startet med en muntlig spørretime, hvor utenriksminister Jonas Gahr Støre besvarte spørsmål fra representant Peter N. Myhre (FrP) om dialog med organisasjoner som kritisert for terroraktivitet. Myhre mente at det er uklart hvor grensen ligger for hvilke grupper utenriksministeren betrakter som egnet for dialog, og gav eksempler på Farc (Colombia) og ETA (Spania). Støre forsvarte dialogen med Det muslimske brorskap i Egypt, som han beskrev som en del av grupper som har vært undertrykt, og pekte på at målet er å forstå deres syn på demokrati, menneskerettigheter og sosiale forhold. Han understrepte at dialogen ikke er en anerkjennelse av organisasjonen, men en måte å uttrykke motstand og gi dem ansvar for holdningene de fremmer.

Tone Liljeroth (FrP) stillede et følgingsspørsmål om om det kan oppfattes som legitimasjon av en ytterliggående islamistisk organisasjon. Støre svarte at han ikke automatisk betrakter dem som slikt, men at dialogen er kritisk og må ta hensyn til deres interne spenninger og holdninger. Han tror at engasjementet kan bidra til å forstå deres rolle i Egypt og fremme demokrati, selv om de har kritiske syn på menneskerettigheter. Møtet avsluttet med at presidenten opplyste at de hadde gått videre til neste representantforslag.