Home › Categories › Government & Policy› Prop Comparison

Prop Comparison.pdf

Comparison.pdf

🔗 Source: le.utah.gov

📊 Size: 200 KB

👤 Author: Daniel Cheung

⬇️ Downloads: 114

Summary

Proposition 2 and HB 3001, Utah Medical Cannabis Act, have key similarities and differences. Similarities include no limit on cannabis processing facilities and independent cannabis testing laboratories, both requiring licenses from UDAF. Differences include the number of cannabis cultivation facility licenses (15 in Proposition 2, 10 in HB 3001), size limits for cultivation facilities (none in Proposition 2, 100,000 square feet for indoor and four acres for outdoor in HB 3001), and medical cannabis distribution methods (dispensaries in Proposition 2, pharmacies or state central fill in HB 3001). Patient eligibility and provider requirements also differ, with Proposition 2 allowing recommendations by licensed MD, DO, or APRN, and HB 3001 requiring a registered "qualified medical provider" with specific education and licensure. Additionally, Proposition 2 has a 20% patient limit for physicians, while HB 3001 has a 175-patient limit for qualified medical providers. Qualifying conditions and patient age requirements also vary between the two.

Download File

Description

Proposition 2 and HB 3001, Utah Medical Cannabis Act, have key similarities and differences.

Technical Information

File Format: PDF
File Size: 200 KB
Pages: 5
Language: EN
Author: Daniel Cheung
Total Downloads: 114
Last Updated: 7 days ago

Document Overview

This PDF document about Prop Comparison provides comprehensive information and guidance. Whether you're a beginner or advanced user, this resource offers valuable insights into Prop Comparison.