Submissions In Response To Housing SEPP Consultation Draft - V - Z, Other.pdf

The submission argues that student accommodation should be defined separately from co-living housing, as it does not provide a permanent place of residence and has distinct needs. The proposed amendments to the Education and Child Care SEPP would only permit student housing on school and tertiary institution campuses, which does not support private sector provision of student accommodation.

The submission also comments on the Draft Housing SEPP 2021, agreeing with the need for affordable housing, but suggesting that a mandated percentage of affordable housing should be determined, similar to other major global cities. The submission strongly disagrees with making affordable housing available to moderate-income households, as it would favor them over very low and low-income groups.

The submission also raises concerns about the Floor Space Ratio, boarding houses, and co-living housing, suggesting that the formulas are confusing, and the provisions for parking, solar access, and communal living areas are inadequate. It strongly agrees that existing affordable housing should be retained and that boarding houses should be used for affordable housing in perpetuity.

Additionally, the submission comments on seniors housing, suggesting that there should be lift requirements and that the parking provisions for hostels and residential care are insufficient. It also questions the justification for Floor Space Ratio bonuses for Vertical Villages, suggesting that they are confusing and unnecessary.