Home › Categories › Law & Legal› Caution Attorneys Must Not Forget Their Duty Of Candor

Caution Attorneys Must Not Forget Their Duty Of Candor.pdf

APR2022_UPDATE-004.pdf

Preview of Caution Attorneys Must not Forget Their Duty of Candor

🔗 Source: wingertlaw.com

📊 Size: 235 KB

📄 Pages: 2 pages

⬇️ Downloads: 92

Summary

The Second District Court of Appeal in People v. Williams (2022) reminded attorneys that their Duty of Candor requires citing adverse on-point authority, but also allows them to argue for a contrary conclusion. The court criticized an attorney for not citing a 1992 decision that held a similar order was non-appealable, and stated that the duty of candor is one of disclosure, not acquiescence, and that attorneys can fulfill their duty to both their client and the court by disclosing adverse authority while arguing for a different outcome.

Download File

Description

The Second District Court of Appeal in People v.

Technical Information

File Format: PDF
File Size: 235 KB
Pages: 2
Language: EN
Total Downloads: 92
Last Updated: 3 months ago

Document Overview

This PDF document about Caution Attorneys Must not Forget Their Duty of Candor provides comprehensive information and guidance. Whether you're a beginner or advanced user, this resource offers valuable insights into Caution Attorneys Must not Forget Their Duty of Candor.