Let me start by reading through the provided text carefully.
The document is from the Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee. It's about the suspension of Frank Alfred Baker. The key points are the date of suspension (July 25, 2016), the reason being his convictions for serious crimes like conspiracy to commit wire fraud, false statements to FDIC, and false claims against the US. There are specific counts mentioned: four wire fraud, two false statements to FDIC, and one false claim.
The Supreme Court ordered the Board to take formal action to decide the final discipline. Also, Baker has to follow Rule 9, Section 28 regarding obligations for suspended attorneys. The email and contact info are there, but the user said to avoid any markers or titles, so I should focus on the main content.
I need to make sure the summary is in English, as per the user's request. It should be concise, so I'll list the main facts without extra details. Check if there's any other important info like the release date or the contact details, but the user mentioned to start directly with the content, so maybe just the suspension details and the subsequent actions by the Board. Also, note the BPR number and the contact person.
Wait, the user specified not to add any language markers or titles, so I should omit the board name and the contact info unless necessary. The main points are the suspension date, the reason (convictions), the specific crimes, the court's order for a formal proceeding, and the compliance requirements.
I need to structure this clearly. Start with the suspension, then the charges, the court's action, and the compliance part. Make sure it's all in one paragraph, no markdown, just plain text. Avoid any extra information not in the document. Let me verify the numbers again: four counts of wire fraud, two false statements to FDIC, and one false claim against the US.
Also, the release is dated July 27, 2016, so that's the date the information was released. But the user might not need that unless it's relevant. The summary should be factual and include all the key elements from the document. Alright, that should cover it.
Frank Alfred Baker, BPR #31931, was suspended from the practice of law by the Tennessee Supreme Court on July 25, 2016, under Rule 9, Section 22.3, following his conviction for conspiracy to commit wire fraud, false statements to the FDIC, and false claims against the United States. The suspension was imposed due to multiple counts of wire fraud (four), false statements to the FDIC (two), and a false claim to the U.S. government. The Supreme Court directed the Board of Professional Responsibility to initiate a formal proceeding to determine the appropriate disciplinary action. Baker is required to comply with Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 9, Section 28, which outlines obligations for suspended attorneys. The Board’s contact information and procedural details are provided for follow-up.
