Is SARS-CoV-2 Really Isolated? A Scientific Analysis Of Virus Purification And Its Implications.pdf

The definition of isolation clarifies that a virus, as a distinct entity, must be physically separated and purified from other materials to confirm its existence. Despite ongoing controversy, the authors argue that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated or purified. Key consequences include:

- Uncertainty in structure, composition, and function of hypothetical viral components due to lack of isolation.
- Inability to determine genetic sequence without a pure sample.
- Impossible confirmation of "variants" without isolated viruses.
- Undemonstrated link between SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 disease.

Proper virus isolation involves:

1. Collecting samples from many symptomatic individuals.
2. Purifying the specimens through maceration, filtration, and ultracentrifugation.
3. Visualizing identical viral particles via electron microscopy.
4. Characterizing physical and chemical properties, structure, and genetic makeup of isolated particles.
5. Demonstrating exogenous (external) origin to confirm viral nature.
6. Showing infectivity and transmission by exposing healthy subjects to the isolated virus.

Criticisms are raised against methods used in alleged SARS-CoV-2 "isolation," highlighting:

- Inadequate sample purification, often mixing with other tissue materials.
- Misuse of tissue culture systems that generate a mixture of particles, some containing genetic material from multiple sources.
- Lack of electron microscopy confirmation and genuine viral genome extraction.

The authors conclude that SARS-CoV-2 has not been scientifically proven to exist, questioning the basis for public health measures like mask mandates and lockdowns. They also raise doubts about the purpose of injectable "vaccines.