Home › Categories › Science & Nature› Peer Review File

Peer Review File.pdf

41467_2021_21445_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

🔗 Source: static-content.springer.com

📊 Size: 168 KB

👤 Author: rfr6946

⬇️ Downloads: 139

Summary

Reviewers #1 and #2 provided comments on the manuscript. Reviewer #1 stated that the authors addressed most concerns, but had issues with the animal experiments being performed only once, the refusal to test the hypothesis using the reference CART19, and the lack of availability of all panels to readers. Reviewer #2 noted that the authors made a credible effort to address the critique, but several concerns remained, including technical execution of experiments, ability to extrapolate findings, and narrative and style of the manuscript. The authors responded to the comments, providing additional information and justifications for their methods and results. Reviewer #2 raised specific concerns about alloreactivity, T-cell activation, and the discussion of alternative mechanisms of resistance. The authors replied to these concerns, providing additional data and explanations.

Download File

Description

Reviewers #1 and #2 provided comments on the manuscript.

Technical Information

File Format: PDF
File Size: 168 KB
Pages: 9
Language: EN
Author: rfr6946
Total Downloads: 139
Last Updated: 7 days ago

Document Overview

This PDF document about Peer Review File provides comprehensive information and guidance. Whether you're a beginner or advanced user, this resource offers valuable insights into Peer Review File.